Announcement PDF ASX Release 24 June 2025 High Grade Gallium Re-assay Results at Cummins Range Engage with this announcement at the RareX investor hub. Highlights • Assays for the first 15 drill holes have been received for the initial 58 drill hole re-assaying program - further assaying will be reported in due course. • Historical drill holes contain values up to 6,826 g/t Ga2O3 • Significant gallium intercepts from re-assaying of pulps include: o 60m at 99 g/t Ga2O3, 3% TREO and 195 g/t Sc2O3 from 29m, including 33m at 115 g/t Ga2O3, 4.72% TREO and 258 g/t Sc2O3 o 50m at 68 g/t Ga2O3, 2% TREO and 227 g/t Sc2O3 from 47m, including 5m at 113 g/t Ga2O3, 10.2% TREO and 420 g/t Sc2O3 • These results confirm the unexpected discovery of gallium at Cummins Range in April made from re-analysis of historical data. This puts Cummins Range as potentially the highest grade and most advanced gallium deposit in Australia whilst remaining one of Australia’s most significant undeveloped rare earth deposits. • Gallium is on the critical mineral list for Europe, America and Australia and, with the growth of A.I. chips, electronics, semi-conductors and solar panels, it is anticipated the gallium market will grow significantly from US$2.45B in 2024 to US$21.53B by 20341. RareX Limited (ASX: REE – RareX, or the Company) is pleased to announce the first re-assay results of the highgrade gallium at the Cummins Range carbonatite pipe. The discovery of multiple wide, high-grade intercepts of gallium in the 2007 drilling results have been confirmed with re-assaying of the 2020 infill drilling. The outstanding results are occurring alongside high-grade rare earths, phosphate, and scandium mineralisation. CEO and Managing Director, James Durrant, commented: “This latest round of assays confirms what our early analysis suggested; the gallium at Cummins Range is not only real, but significant. With consistent grades now returned from infill drilling, we can probably say Cummins Range is one of Australia’s most advanced and highestgrade gallium projects. “What makes this particularly strategic is that the gallium sits within a broader rare earth-phosphate-scandium system, making Cummins Range one of the most geopolitically relevant critical mineral deposits in the country. With Chinese supply effectively off the table, and no meaningful Western production, we’re now prioritising pathways to unlock gallium as a core value stream alongside rare earths and phosphate, including working in our strategic partnership with Gega Elements to assess novel refining technology that could enable low-cost gallium extraction.” Most of the world’s gallium is produced as a byproduct of aluminium and zinc refining. Gallium grades are generally classified as follows: low-grade (30–50 g/t), moderate-grade (50–100 g/t), and high-grade (>100 g/t). Initial assessments have identified a moderate-grade area of 500m x 500m, with significant higher grade zones occurring within and near high grade rare earth and scandium mineralisation. Notable intercepts from the re-assaying of pulps include: 1 https://www.factmr.com/report/gallium- market#:~:text=Gallium%20Market%20Outlook%20(2024%20to%202034)&text=The%20market%20has%20been%20forecasted,element%20with%20atomic%20number%2031 • CRX0002 - 60m at 99 g/t Ga2O3, 3% TREO and 195 g/t Sc2O3 from 29m, including 33m at 115 g/t Ga2O3, 4.72% TREO and 258 g/t Sc2O3 • CRX0025 - 50m at 68 g/t Ga2O3, 2% TREO and 227 g/t Sc2O3 from 47m, including 5m at 113 g/t Ga2O3, 10.2% TREO and 420 g/t Sc2O3 • CRX0032 - 27m at 75 g/t Ga2O3, 1.4% TREO and 166 g/t Sc2O3 from 28m, including 3m at 108 g/t Ga2O3, 2.3% TREO and 205 g/t Sc2O3 Notable high-grade intercepts from Cummins Range include2: • NRC016 - 99m at 106 g/t Ga2O3, 0.77% TREO and 160 g/t Sc2O3 from 1m to EOH • NRC058 - 74m at 123 g/t Ga2O3, 2.4% TREO and 186 g/t Sc2O3 from surface, including 30m at 206 g/t Ga2O3, 4.6% TREO and 310 g/t Sc2O3 • NRC037 - 56m at 114 g/t Ga2O3, 1.5% TREO and 263 g/t Sc2O3 from 44m, including 11m at 220 g/t Ga2O3, 3% TREO and 639 g/t Sc2O3 • NRC038 - 60m at 124 g/t Ga2O3, 3% TREO and 372 g/t Sc2O3 from 36m, including 12m at 242 g/t Ga 2O3, 6.7% TREO and 638 g/t Sc2O3 Gallium at Cummins Range Cummins Range carbonatite has a resource of 524Mt at 0.31% TREO, 4.6% P2O5 and 70 g/t Sc2O3, including a higher grade resource of 44Mt at 1% TREO3. In March, RareX identified that historical regolith RC drilling, conducted between 2007 and 2012 by Navigator Resources and Kimberley Rare Earths were mostly assayed for gallium. A total of 11,487 assays for gallium were completed with 36% of the assays containing >40 g/t Ga 2O3 and values up to 6826 g/t (0.68%). Details on the 2007-2012 drilling, including numerous high-grade intercepts are described in the 25 March 2025 ASX release “RareX Discovers High grade Gallium at Cummins Range”. Since RareX acquired the Project in 2019, 30,000m of drilling has been completed with no gallium assays completed. RareX have begun to re-assay the pulps from recent drilling starting with the 2020 infill drilling. In 2020, RareX completed an infill drilling program designed to upgrade the inferred rare earths resource to an indicated resource. A total of 58 drill holes for 6,146m of RC drilling was completed. Results from the first 15 drill holes have been received and have confirmed high grade gallium over wide intervals. The most elevated results are coincident with high grade rare earth and scandium content that have been upgraded due to a combination of residual, or eluvial and chemical weathering. The exceptional gallium, rare earths, and scandium results are continuing to elevate the critical metals significance of the Cummins Range deposit. Figure 1 shows section 307315E with gallium grades across 250m of the Rare Carbonatite Dyke. The mineralisation is contained in the weathered saprolite zone. The location of the section and 2020 infill drill holes are shown on Figure 2. 2 ASX Announcement: 25 March 2025 - RareX Discovers High Grade Gallium at Cummins Range 3 ASX Announcement: 25 January 2024 - Cummins Range Mineral Resource Estimate Update: Indicated 77.4Mt at 0.46% TREO, 6.7% P O and 90g/t Sc O ; Inferred 446.9Mt at 0.28% TREO, 4.2% P O 2 5 2 3 2 5 and 70g/t Sc2O3 Figure 1. Section 307315E. Showing gallium intercepts at Cummins Range deposit. Section location is shown in Figure 2 and intersection specifics are in Appendix 1 Figure 2. Collar location plan showing carbonatite dykes 100m below surface. Also showing Section (Figure 1) location. The Global Gallium Market The global gallium market is dominated by China, which controls 98% of global gallium production4 With the growth of electronics, semi-conductors and solar panels is anticipated the gallium market will grow significantly from US$2.45 billion in 2024 to US$21.53 billion by 20345. Beyond China, production alternatives are limited. Russia ranks as the second-largest producer globally, but at a mere 5 metric tons in 2022—representing just 0.81% of global production—its output is negligible compared to China's dominance6. No other countries are significant producers of primary gallium, creating a near-monopoly situation that heightens supply risk for importing nations. 4 https://www.mining.com/web/gallium-price-rises-to-highest-since-2011-following-china-export-curbs/; https://www.statista.com/statistics/1441110/primary-production-of-gallium-worldwide-by- country/ 5 https://www.factmr.com/report/galliummarket#:~:text=Gallium%20Market%20Outlook%20(2024%20to%202034)&text=The%20market%20has%20been%20forecasted,element%20with%20atomic%20number%2031 6 https://www.mining.com/web/gallium-price-rises-to-highest-since-2011-following-china-export-curbs/; https://www.statista.com/statistics/1441110/primary-production-of-gallium-worldwide-bycountry/ Expanding Demand Across Multiple Sectors The demand for gallium has expanded dramatically across numerous high-tech sectors, contributing significantly to the upward pressure on prices. The global gallium market is projected to grow from $2.32 billion in 2024 to $2.91 billion in 2025, representing a compound annual growth rate CAGR of 25.4%7. More aggressive forecasts suggest the market could reach $17.0 billion by 2032, expanding at a CAGR of 24.5%8. Upward price pressure is likely to persist as demand continues to expand across the semiconductor, telecommunications, defense, and renewable energy sectors. Price Increases and Market Dynamics Gallium prices have experienced remarkable volatility and overall upward trajectory in recent years, influenced by a complex interplay of supply constraints and growing demand. In December 2024, gallium prices surged to $575 per kilogram (delivered to Rotterdam), representing a 17% increase over previous levels and reaching the highest point since 2011.9 The most significant factor driving recent price increases has been China's strategic export restrictions. Beijing implemented initial controls on gallium exports in August 2023, which immediately disrupted global supply chains and pushed prices higher. By December 2024, China had escalated these measures, announcing a comprehensive ban on gallium exports to the United States, further intensifying market pressures. Since China accounts for approximately 98% of global gallium production, these export restrictions have had outsized impacts on global availability and pricing. China's production advantage stems from its integration of gallium recovery with its massive aluminum industry, as gallium is typically extracted from the alumina processing stream10. Gallium Applications Semiconductor Applications and Integrated Circuits11 The semiconductor industry represents the largest demand driver for gallium, with approximately 74% of gallium imported into the United States during 2023 being used in integrated circuits. Gallium arsenide GaAs and gallium nitride GaN compounds have become critical semiconductor materials across multiple industries, including hightech, automotive, aerospace, healthcare, and telecommunications sectors. Gallium nitride semiconductors are particularly valuable due to their superior power density and heat resistance properties. Traditionally used primarily in military applications, GaN is now finding increased adoption in commercial applications including 5G networks, wireless infrastructure, power electronics, satellites, electric vehicles, and consumer electronics. As one manufacturer noted, “GaN offers higher power density, more reliable operation and improved efficiency over traditional silicon-only based solutions". Optoelectronic Devices12 Approximately 25% of gallium consumption goes toward optoelectronic devices such as laser diodes, light-emitting diodes LEDs , photodetectors, and solar cells. The rapid growth in popularity of electronic devices including mobile phones, laptops, televisions, and lighting applications continues to drive demand in this segment. These applications are particularly important for fiber optic communications and high-speed data transmission technologies, which represent growth areas for the future. 7 https://blog.tbrc.info/2025/02/gallium-market-drivers-2/ 8 https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/market-research/gallium-market.asp 9 https://www.mining.com/web/gallium-price-rises-to-highest-since-2011-following-china-export-curbs/; https://www.mining.com/web/gallium-price-has-more-than-doubled-since-china-export-curbs/ 10 https://www.fitechem.com/news/gallium-price-floor-set-to-rise-in-2021/ 11 https://www.metaltechnews.com/story/2024/09/16/critical-minerals-alliances-2024/us-looks-for-domes tic-gallium-sources/1917.html 12 https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/gallium-market-report Renewable Energy Applications13 The renewable energy sector represents an emerging but potentially massive source of gallium demand. Thin-film solar panels rely heavily on gallium for their high efficiency, and as renewable energy adoption accelerates globally, gallium requirements are expected to grow substantially. Europe alone is projected to consume up to 26 times more gallium by 2030 compared to current levels, according to the Fraunhofer Institute. The scale of potential demand is staggering—Austria's planned renewable energy projects, despite serving a population of only 9 million, would require approximately 4.5 times the current global gallium production. This statistic underscores the looming supply-demand imbalance as gallium becomes increasingly integral to both energy independence and environmental commitments worldwide. This announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of Rarex. 13 https://strategicmetalsinvest.com/gallium-prices/ Competent Person’s Statement The information in this report that related to exploration results has been compiled and reviewed by Mr Guy Moulang. Mr Guy Moulang is a full-time employee of RareX Limited and is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for the Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code). Mr Guy Moulang consents to the disclosure of the information in this report in the form and context in which it appears. Reference List • https://www.factmr.com/report/galliummarket#:~:text=Gallium%20Market%20Outlook%20(2024%20to%202034)&text=The%20market%20has%20b een%20forecasted,element%20with%20atomic%20number%2031 • https://www.mining.com/web/gallium-price-rises-to-highest-since-2011-following-china-export-curbs/ • https://strategicmetalsinvest.com/gallium-prices/ • https://www.statista.com/statistics/1445285/gallium-share-of-production-worldwide-by-country/ • https://www.fitechem.com/news/gallium-price-floor-set-to-rise-in-2021/ • https://blog.tbrc.info/2025/02/gallium-market-drivers-2/ • https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/market-research/gallium-market.asp • https://www.metaltechnews.com/story/2024/09/16/critical-minerals-alliances-2024/us-looks-for-domes ticgallium-sources/1917.html • https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/gallium-market-report • https://www.statista.com/statistics/1441110/primary-production-of-gallium-worldwide-by-country/ • https://www.mining.com/web/gallium-price-has-more-than-doubled-since-china-export-curbs/ • https://www.csiro.au/en/news/all/articles/2024/june/critical-mineral-galliumgermanium#:~:text=Global%20demand%20for%20gallium%20is,is%20from%202015%20to%202030 • https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/scandium-market RareX is a critical minerals company specialising in rare earths and gallium, niobium as well as scandium in hard rock carbonatites. The exploration focus of the business is on the Mt Mansbridge xenotime heavy rare earths project near Browns Range, the Khaleesi Project in the East Yilgarn which is a district-scale, elevated gallium & niobium, alkaline intrusive complex, and the Cummins Range near-mine anomalies. The Company’s engineering and commercial focus is on the mid-study-level, Cummins Range Project (+$330M NPV8 post-tax*) - a carbonatite hosted rare earths and phosphate project, containing magnet grade rare earths and battery grade phosphates, and substantial gallium and scandium. It is technically Australia’s largest undeveloped rare earths project. RareX have been curating a portfolio of carbonatite related projects including the newly acquired bulls-eye Piper Project along trend from both Nolans Bore and the Luni niobium deposit. RareX will continue to develop and optimise its portfolio. RareX maintains material investments in Kincora Copper (ASX:KCC), Cosmos Exploration (ASX:C1X) and Canada Rare Earth Corporation (LL.V). For further information on the Company and its projects visit www.rarex.com.au * The forecast financial information was released on 22 August 2023. The Company confirms that the material assumptions underpinning the production target and forecast financial information continue to apply and have not materially changed Appendix 1: Significant Intercepts and Drill Collar Details Significant Intercepts Hole From CRX0001 30 CRX0001 41 CRX0001 67 CRX0002 11 Incl. 29 Incl. 29 CRX0003 10 CRX0003 36 CRX0004 12 CRX0005 12 CRX0005 18 CRX0005 60 CRX0006 0 Incl. 11 CRX0022 NSI CRX0023 32 Incl. 35 CRX0023 76 CRX0024 41 CRX0025 47 Incl. 53 CRX0025 101 CRX0026 21 Incl. 31 CRX0029 7 Incl. 17 CRX0029 48 CRX0030 6 CRX0030 27 CRX0030 42 CRX0030 56 CRX0031 6 Incl. 7 37 47 69 89 89 62 14 54 51 34 21 72 17 13 Interval 7 6 2 78 60 33 4 18 39 22 3 12 17 2 Ga2O3 g/t 57 42 60 87 99 115 68 46 53 73 218 41 48 89 TREO % 0.33 0.25 0.4 2.38 2.98 4.72 0.49 0.34 0.41 1.42 5.48 0.16 0.61 3.91 50 38 89 51 97 58 115 105 61 39 30 76 20 38 47 69 46 10 18 3 13 10 50 5 14 84 30 32 13 28 14 11 5 13 40 3 75 91 52 68 68 113 50 57 71 59 73 57 52 51 72 62 69 108 0.61 0.69 0.3 1.04 2.05 10.16 0.89 0.94 0.55 0.78 0.83 0.88 0.65 0.51 0.54 0.71 1.17 3.87 To Sc2O3 g/t Nb2O5 % 104 0.1 69 0.08 85 0.1 171 0.15 195 0.17 258 0.24 171 0.18 87 0.09 56 0.06 142 0.24 301 0.28 28 0.05 74 0.07 38 0.07 218 316 71 300 227 420 178 148 145 100 115 108 104 71 132 118 212 565 0.2 0.37 0.07 0.28 0.15 0.37 0.11 0.1 0.06 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.25 1.18 P2O5 % 3 3 8 12 13 14 3 12 8 8 20 6 4 4 Peak Ga2O3 Value 59 43 64 322 322 322 80 73 134 360 360 42 118 118 14 13 5 12 10 7 12 14 10 21 23 19 13 15 14 17 13 10 104 104 68 90 113 113 66 93 93 85 85 78 63 83 85 102 125 125 CRX0031 CRX0032 CRX0032 Incl. CRX0032 Incl. 54 1 28 39 63 68 65 15 55 42 73 72 11 14 27 3 10 4 43 57 75 108 85 125 0.21 0.65 1.39 2.25 3.56 6.5 72 314 166 205 295 415 0.09 0.21 0.11 0.19 0.22 0.27 Easting 307265.31 307266.27 307266.55 307266.36 307266.75 307266.68 307316.91 307317.47 307316.64 307315.86 307315.94 307458.61 307456.82 307315.44 307314.87 mRL 391.54 391.5 391.76 391.86 391.9 392.13 391.26 391.41 391.53 391.71 391.68 392 391.83 391.64 391.68 Depth 114 90 97 102 97 84 96 114 132 132 132 114 114 102 96 Azimuth 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 7 11 18 17 15 18 Drill Collar Details Hole ID CRX0001 CRX0002 CRX0003 CRX0004 CRX0005 CRX0006 CRX0022 CRX0023 CRX0024 CRX0025 CRX0026 CRX0029 CRX0030 CRX0031 CRX0032 Grid MGA2020_52 MGA2020_52 MGA2020_52 MGA2020_52 MGA2020_52 MGA2020_52 MGA2020_52 MGA2020_52 MGA2020_52 MGA2020_52 MGA2020_52 MGA2020_52 MGA2020_52 MGA2020_52 MGA2020_52 Northing 7866582.12 7866621.14 7866660.51 7866700.79 7866741 7866778.94 7866486.8 7866533.33 7866583.57 7866627.67 7866659.38 7866860.33 7866820.81 7866700.62 7866739.02 Dip 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 53 68 104 104 154 154 Appendix 2: JORC Tables Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Sampling techniques • • Navigator Resources (2007), 148 AC holes (4,510 m), 93 reverse circulation holes (RC) (9,293 m). Holes drilled 60° towards south, 40 m spacing. • Kimberley Rare Earths (2012), 77 RC holes (4,229 m). • Navigator (NAV) Drilling NRC001-NRC0093 (drilled in 2007); 4 m composite spear samples were taken and assayed. Assay intervals that returned results <1000 ppm Ce were then resampled. The 10% cone splits from the drill rig were then used for the 1m re-assays. • Kimberly Rare Earths (KRE) Drilling KRC094-KRC0170 (2012) – All drill meters were assayed on 1 m intervals using a 10% cone split from the drill rig. • RareX Limited (2020), 58 RC holes (6,146 m). 1m samples through mineralised zones and up to 4m composites in unmineralized areas Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. • All RareX, Kimberley Rare Earth and rare earth mineralised samples from Navigator were taken using the cone splitter on the drill rig or a riffle splitter. • It is not documented how Navigator and Kimberly identified mineralisation. Kimberly Rare Earths blanket assayed 1m intervals and analysed for Gallium. Navigator blanket assayed with 4m composites and did not include gallium. Samples with >1000ppm Ce were re-assayed at 1m intervals and did analyse for gallium. Drilling techniques • Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.). • The drilling technique used was reverse circulation (RC) drilling Drill sample recovery • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. The 2007-2012 samples (Navigator Resources and Kimberley Rare Earths Ltd) were collected as both 4m composites for initial assaying and 1m samples for follow up assaying of anomalous zones. Most holes had good sample recovery although a limited number of holes encountered high ground water inflow and karst type weathering in void formations at depth exceeding 40m. Difficult drilling conditions including binding clays, voids and water flow in several holes. • The 2020 infill drill program (RareX) involved drilling between historic drillholes to test continuity of grade. The program used a larger and more capable rig which resulted Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary in good recoveries in most of the drilling with an averaged of greater than 90% sample recovery. Logging Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. • No measures were described in the historical reports regarding maximising sample recovery. • RareX ensured the cyclone was cleaned after every 3 m drill run and where sticky clays were intersected, the driller would lift the hammer off the bottom and clean the cyclone after each metre. Wet samples were left open for water to evaporate. • There doesn’t appear to be a relationship between sample recovery/grade and sample bias. Although you can’t calculate this from the data captured by KRE and NAV • All but three drill holes (NRC090-NRC093 for a total of 300 m) have had a geological log completed. • All of the above logs are quantitative with the exception of geological logs in the regolith which can be qualitative. • The detail of logging is considered by the Competent Person to be appropriate for Mineral Resource estimation. • Navigator Drilling NRC001-NRC0093 – 4m composite spear samples were taken using a PVC spear. Assay intervals that returned results <1000 ppm Ce were then resampled. The 10% cone splits from the drill rig were then used for the 1 m re-assays. This sampling procedure and size is considered appropriate for the grain size of the material being sampled. • Kimberly Rare Earths (KRE) Drilling KRC094-KRC0170 - Drill core were assayed on 1 m intervals using a 10% cone split from the drill rig. This sampling procedure and size is considered appropriate for the grain size of the material being sampled. Quality control procedures have not been documented by NAV or KRE, other than what is described above. • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. • • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. • RareX: CRX0001-CRX0058 – entire Bulk samples were split down into 1-4 m composites using a 50/50 or 75/25 riffle splitter. All samples were dry before splitting. • This technique is industry standard practice. • Field duplicates were taken at an average of 1 in 30 for the RC drilling. • 2020 Lab duplicates were also re-assayed. Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary • Sample sizes are regarded as being appropriate for this style of mineralization. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests Verification of sampling and assaying Location of data points • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established. • Navigator – 4 m composites were taken at the drill rig and sent to Intertek where a 4-acid digest, with ICP-OES and ICP-MS finish (detection limit for gallium was 0.1ppm). Where 4 m composites returned cerium assays >1000 ppm, 1 m re-assays were conducted on each of the metres in the composites. The 1 m reassays were a peroxided fusion digest with ICP-OES and ICP-MS finish. This technique is considered as a total analysis for elements in consideration for this resource. 40 elements were assayed for and detection limit for gallium was 10ppm. Laboratory QA/QC was completed with regular standards, blanks and repeats. • Kimberly Rare Earths used Intertek for the 1m assays using peroxided fusion digest with ICP-OES and ICP-MS finish. This technique is considered as a total analysis for elements in consideration for this resource. 30 elements were assayed for. Laboratory QA/QC was completed with regular standards, blanks and repeats. • The results in this release were assayed using a 4 Acid Digest with a ICP-MS finish. Regular assaying of standards, duplicates and repeats were completed by the laboratory. An alternate assaying method of peroxide fusion with ICP finish was also completed on 26 check samples. • The quality of control procedures adopted by the laboratories are in line with industry standards and acceptable levels of accuracy and precision have been established throughout the generations of assaying. • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • Reported results have not been verified by either an independent or alternative company personnel. • • Twinned holes have been drilled The use of twinned holes. • • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. Data in the announcement has been captured from historical database from NAV and KRE. Geological data is of high quality, and it is assumed these companies followed industry standard procedures and protocols when collecting and storing data. • The assay results have been converted into oxides using the below stochiometric conversion factors: Ga2O3 1.3442, La2O3 1.1728, CeO2 1.2284, Pr6O11 1.2082, Nd2O3 1.1664, Sm2O3 1.1596, Eu2O3 1.1579, Gd2O3 1.1526, Dy2O3 1.1477, Ho2O3 1.1455, Er2O3 1.1435, Tm2O3 1.1421, Yb2O3 1.1387, Lu2O3 1.1371, Sc2O3 1.5338, Y2O3 1.2699, Nb2O5 1.4305, P2O5 2.2916 • Drill hole collars have been surveyed with a DGPS and have and accuracy of 100 mm. • Collar coordinates are in MGA Zone 52H 2020 and have been converted from MGA94 and AMG84 grids. • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drillholes (collar and downhole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource Criteria JORC Code explanation estimation. Data spacing and distribution • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • Whether sample compositing has been applied. Orientation of data in relation to geological structure • Whether the orientation of sampli